Good supplemental texts help you see how the uncertainties of Shakespeare explode off the page, and they give you the tools you need not to "understand" a text -- as though understanding that could be achieved for you via a $6, 96-page pamphlet -- but to read it, and read it well.
When I took my first introductory collegiate Shakespeare course, I found a few supplemental resources especially useful:
- The Meaning of Shakespeare (1951), by Harold C. Goddard. (In two volumes.) Goddard writes lengthy, reflective considerations of Shakespeare's plays and only rarely offers a conclusive interpretation; he generally prefers to roll the plays around his mind until he has found just enough new ways of thinking about them, and then he moves along.
- Northrop Frye on Shakespeare (1986), by Northrop Frye. (Of our texts this semester his book covers only MSND and The Tempest.) Frye was a gifted critic, and these short essays on Shakespeare are excellent introductions to the analytical tools critics bring to Shakespeare's plays.
- Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human (1998), by Harold Bloom. Bloom is generally considered a popular critic rather than an academic one. This is good in that he writes specifically for readers who are coming to Shakespeare as nonexperts; this is bad in that he occasionally oversimplifies Shakespeare. Read any supplemental guide to Shakespeare skeptically, but read Bloom's guide with an extra dose of skepticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment