Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Discussion questions (week 12)

  1. [This question is more or less a repeat of question 3 from our last discussion. You are welcome to recycle your notes.] Look back at your notes from Prof. Dubrow’s lecture about soliloquies from two weeks ago, and particularly the way she connects the soliloquy to a specific function—the creation of sympathy between character and audience. Do the same with a different form: the list. What is the function of the list? Why are there so many in this play? Answer this question by looking closely at one list, e.g.
    • II.iii.28
    • III.i.91ff
    • IV.i passim
  2. I am interested in seeing if we can use the form of discourse that seems to be at the heart of Macbeth to better understand its characters. How do Macbeth and Lady Macbeth soliloquize differently? How can we see the way they soliloquize as representative of differences in their characters?

    Look at four soliloquies: Lady Macbeth's "Unsex me here..." (I.v.38-54), Macbeth's "If it were done..." (I.vii.1-28) and his "Is this a dagger which I see before me..." (II.i.33-64), and Lady Macbeth's "Out, damn'd spot" (V.i.35-68). Here are some specific questions to work through:

    • How do the contexts of these soliloquies differ? Are they -- like the "Two truths are told" soliloquy -- just vocalizations of what the character is thinking? Are they spoken out loud? What do these differences mean?
    • What are the purposes of these soliloquies -- answering questions, a là the Senecan monologue? Giving the audience insight into characters' psychologies?
    • How do they use metaphors (and other figurative language) differently?
    • How do they refer to the physical world differently?

1 comment:

Carl said...

In discussion we spent the last portion of class discussing pre and post guilt for both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth in regards to the murders. I wanted to add some thoughts about Lady Macbeth's post guilt. I noticed that at this point she lost all capability of complex thought--she is relying on only basic observation. It's as if she has dropped down the hierarchy of human thoughts. We all know Maslow's hierarchy of needs--I like to think there is something similar with that of the human way of thinking. In light of a murder, one would like to think that someone would have more to say then simply "who would have thought the old man to have so much blood in him." It's as if she is in shock and is now dead to not only the world but dead to her very own mind as well.